moving the deckchairs on the lifeboat

At the start of the year I woke up at 4:15am and knew I had to get up and turn on the BBC news, don't ask me why, the cats thought I was crazy, I usually get up around 7am.  The item I watched I have never seen since and no one has talked about it. 

Southern Uganda is in the grips of a terrible drought and the report dealt with a family whose children were eating goat hide cut from their tent because food aid had been stopped - not cut down- but stopped dead last November 2010 and they had nothing left to eat. 

The top UN food aid official, a fat man dressed in a suit complete with waistcoat and tie (apologises to chubby people who wear suits) had come from Rome to oversee the end of the food aid policy. The reason given for the policy change and the presence of this apparatchik sweating in the middle of a desert;  it was the fault of the people who had not used the food they had been given responsibly.  I was stunned, no mention of corrupt government creaming off the majority of the aid given their countries, no mention of binding receiving food into buying arms, or any of the other filthy deals done over the years - no folks- this drought and food aid maladministration since the 60s, was all the fault of this tiny shrivelled up woman and her sickly, malnourished children chewing goat hide. She hadn't used the food she had been allocated properly. I mean they had eaten it! (well thank heavens we had cleared that up and know who to blame, it's the ordinary people, especially this woman sitting in the dirt, not corrupt officials, warlords, IMF deals or greedy bankers).

As I watched this huge policy change at 4:30am I felt I understood something really profound, it wasn't just this destitute family in Uganda being destroyed it was all of us, the huge majority of ordinary people, the ones who are not part of the plutocracy and we are coming to a gigantic turning point in world history.

In the dictionary "plutocracy" is defined as government by the wealthy. The plutocracy exercises the preponderance of political power, whether directly or indirectly, (look at our Parliament, especially the Cabinet, how many millionaires sit in the House of Commons?). 
Plutocracy also has a cultural and social aspect that benefits the rich.  If you start to think about society and what it is made up of - universities and colleges, publishing houses, mass circulation magazines, newspapers, television and radio stations, professional sports teams, foundations, churches, private museums, charity organizations are organized as corporations, ruled by boards of trustees (or directors or regents) composed overwhelmingly of very wealthy people often called in Britain "The Great and Good" as compared to the rest of us "The Great Unwashed". 
Considering America and as the only super power you do have to consider America very carefully, I found this quote in "Who Rules America", by sociologist G. William Domhoff.  "The idea that a relatively fixed group of privileged people might shape the economy and government for their own benefit goes against the American grain. Nevertheless . . . the owners and top-level managers in large income-producing properties are far and away the dominant power figures in the United States. Their corporations, banks, and agribusinesses come together as a corporate community that dominates the federal government in Washington. Their real estate, construction, and land development companies form growth coalitions that dominate most local governments. In the US, plutocratic governance is abetted by mass media owned by the hyperwealthy and operated in their own economic self-interest".
If you ally plutocracy with a very destructive but powerful theory called "The Lifeboat Theory" and link that to a world which we all know is running out of conventional resources - well I'll try to explain my thinking.
A man called Garrett Hardin developed a theory and wrote "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor".  He wrote "Environmentalists use the metaphor of the earth as a "spaceship" in trying to persuade countries, industries and people to stop wasting and polluting our natural resources. Since we all share life on this planet, they argue, no single person or institution has the right to destroy, waste, or use more than a fair share of its resources". 
Hardin  disagreed profoundly with the idea of sharing  and mutual responsibility and argued that all the rich countries and rich people are in a lifeboat, not a spaceship, and all the poor countries and poor people are in the water trying to get into the lifeboat to escape drowning.   His question was "does everyone on earth have an equal right to an equal share of its resources?".  It's a fair question but when it's premise is put into action you end up with the BBC showing real, poor people chewing goat hide.
There are lots of reports showing how earth's resources are dwindling and the alternatives offered by "green technology" aren't being taken up fast enough or promoted widely enough to make a difference.  I'm sure that if I have read some of those reports and I'm not an economist, scientist or politician then the people in power, our plutocracy, have read them too and been briefed by the best minds available.  
What are these plutocrats to do? 
 The resources like oil and gas which make their corporations multi-billions and enable them to have the power to speculate in commodities and food unchecked (remember "Glencore") are dwindling, even if at the moment it doesn't seem like that. 
Money and power, the only important things in life ( that is what families like the Bush clan believe) must be preserved and because they cannot face the fact that it is their morally bereft beliefs and actions;  their capitalism red in tooth and claw which has created the situation of pollution and dwindling resources they are looking for a scapegoat which at the same time will make money.  So the IMF impose even more draconian measures on countries whch have taken loans and  then bailouts to cover the loans and then further bailouts (Greece anyone?) to cover the bailouts.
We, the people must be made to work longer, have smaller or no pensions at all, have our rights whittled away and be brainwashed by the mainstream media into accepting this because acording to the favourite lie our country has huge debts which we, the "Great Unwashed" not the "Great and Good" must be made to pay off.
But a problem has arisen for the plutocracy that it did not foresee:  us ordinary people, and it seems to me, people all around the world (praises be to the internet, twitter, social networking, mobiles with cameras and the brave individuals who use the technology, write the blogs and post the pictures) aren't buying into having no rights or their rights taken away, we don't want to lose our pensions, work until we die with no relief or have the NHS privatised or pay more for food or be banned from driving a car, or denied a free education just so that incredibly rich people can make even more money. 
The "Arab Spring" is saying what more and more of us want to say;  we are going to try and base our societies on social justice, a fairer distribution of resources which Huey Long dreamed of giving everyone the rights enshrined in the American Bill of Rights (how ironic seeing how America has turned out) ratified in 1781 protecting the natural rights of liberty and property including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, a free press, free assembly, and free association. 
What I have written is only a tiny part of the real politik we all face, the turmoil of the secret wars for resources being fought in the Arctic and Antarctic, the economic war between the USA, Russia and China, the cyber wars, the still unresolved Middle East, the problems the EU face, the wars in Africa these are partly the plutocracy fighting for supremacy and sometimes it seems there are only terrible things to think about but I truly believe at the end of the day we will all be in the lifeboat and there will be deckchairs for everyone.

no such thing as a free lunch

Ever since I started writing this blog I have been testing out various ways of making money or getting freebies and I have had some success.  I signed up to anwer about 4 or 5 surveys each day and I registered with "Free Stuff".  I got 6 free tomato plants so I will have free tomatoes this year.  I was awarded 2 £10.00 wouchers for Amazon and at the rate I read that equals 4 books maybe more as I use "Kindle" and some  ebooks are free.

I faithfully fill in my surveys and commodetise my opinions about fruit juices, health products and the merits of furniture polish.  I particularly like "YouGov" as that one is more fun and you can be rude about David Cameron and George Osborne.  I have been clocking up points and gaining entries for prize draws, so many I have lost count as all these sites run prize draws each month or quarter and I won a computer game I actually want to play with backgammon chess and card games.

So, I will keep going as I don't care enough about furniture polish to feel my privacy is being invaded or that I am being used to make companies profit and I love tomatoes.

Only 5% of the UK population earns £60,000.00 a year most people earn £24,000.00 a year and are watching their incomes and standard of living erode drastically, a chance win on a prize draw or lottery will not change our society or bring people out of poverty.

I want every household in the UK which earns less than £40,000.00 a year to receive £10,000.00 as a gift tax free to use as they see fit, the only proviso being if  it is used for a holiday the holiday must be taken in the UK to support our tourist industry.

I can hear the hysteria erupting from the uber rich and people who believe the lie that Britain is broke and everyone must "do their bit" and "tighten their belts" we spend millions on wars and weapons, security for that wedding and bailing out bankers and hedge funds but children live in dire poverty. We have got to change the dynamic, not trickle down economics but bottom up synergy.

Just apply a gift of £10,000.00 to your own life.  I would pay off all my bills and use part of it to take a course to learn a language, buy some new clothes, go to the theatre and invest in my business. In that one sentence all the companies I owe money now have cash flow, the clothes shops, language provider and the arts have now got some revenue they didn't have before and my publishing company will have funds. Young people who couldn't afford to leave home will have money for renting a flat of their own, setting up their own business or going to college.

Use your imagination and follow the money it would transform our country.

I am going to close now and leave this while I think it over further.

shopping, oh god, shopping

When worshipping at the great shrine of "Shopping".  The first thing you should do after genuflecting at the altar, is make a list. It helps you focus on what you need to buy and what you have to spend, I am not going to make comparisons between shops and supermarkets etc as that is easy to do and I don't want to promote one over another. I do all my shopping on line as it is cheaper - you don't spend money travelling to and from the supermarket, you save time and effort as you don't lose hours trailing around the aisles of your chosen church or have to lug huge bags of shopping on and off public transport or in and out of your car and you don't get distracted by periphal "offers" you don't really need but which all add up.

I don't drive, I have always used public trransport and for years I have had a shopping trolley, I know it sounds so old fashioned and something your great granny would have used with some boiled sweets embedded in the side pocket but I really reommend it - any special offers, cheap fruit at the market, bulk buy bread at the end of the day stick it in the trolley and save your arms from growing extra inches.

My trolley helped me run my book business;  I would drag my trolley around all the charity shops where I used to go and find my stock of second hand books.  I started my company "Serendipity Books" with £5.00 which I saved out of my weekly wage of £80.00. I went to my local charity shops and bought £5.00 worth of books which I sold to a local book dealer and made a profit of £15.00 and I repeated the process over and over again. This was before amazon.com or e-commerce.  I progressed to a stall at the local book fairs then finally after some years I had enough for a small bookshop.  No bank will help a woman by herself who has no collateral and I was too "wealthy and priveleged" to be eligible for anything like "The Princes Trust" grants so I did it by myself and I couldn't have done it without my trolley.

Anyway enough of  prehistoric times when mammoths roamed the earth and back to the future why are all the prices rising so fast and going so high?   Every day seems to see a new increase and supermarkets are trying to lessen the pain with loss leaders; there are some extremely difficult things that have to be looked at and I don't think our government will be able to deal with them becase it goes to the heart of the way we live and the systems at the core of everything that surrounds us.

In 2010, investment bank "Goldman Sachs" warned of "violent price spikes" in commodities markets, and that prediction has more or less come true.

The rapid rise in prices for food, fuel and commodities has been disastrous for the world's poor who are always hit hardest and hit first but now those rapid rises are filtering into middle class life but it's a bonanza for multinational trading firms such as "Glencore" - the world's largest diversified commodities trader - is planning a US$11billion share sale, probaby the largest market debut ever seen on the London Stock Exchange.

The initial public offering from the commodity speculating giant will create at least four billionaires, dozens worth more than $100million and several hundred old fashioned millionaires. Chief Executive Ivan Glasenberg is set to make more than $9bn from the share sale. And speculating on food prices is an important part of his wealth.

Valued at about $60billion, "Glencore" controls 50 per cent of the global copper market, 60 per cent of zinc, 38 per cent in alumina, 28 per cent of thermal coal, 45 per cent of lead and almost 10 per cent of the world's wheat - according to information the firm disclosed prior to its share sale. It also controls about one quarter of the world market in barley, sunflower and rape seed. 

"They are possibly one of very few mining companies that are price makers, rather than price takers," said Chris Hinde, editorial director of Mining Journal magazine. "They are the stockbrokers of the commodities business [operating] in a fairly secretive world. They are effectively setting the price for some very important commodities,". 

The firm employs about 57,000 people, generated a turnover of $145billion in the past year and has assets worth more than $79billion.  Based in Baar, Switzerland, where regulation is minimal, the company's sprawling interests span Bolivian tin mines, Angolan oil, zinc producers in Kazakhstan, Zambian copper mines and Russian wheat operations.
"Glencore's vertical integration really is unprecedented," said Devlin Kuyek, a researcher with GRAIN, a non-profit international organisation working on food security.

"Glencore" owns almost 300,000 hectares of farm land and it is one of the largest farm operators in the world. They are engaging in speculation on the grain trade and have immense market power,".

Global food prices have climbed recently, returning close to their 2008 peak, when bread riots swept parts of the Middle East, Africa and the Caribbean.
"A disturbing amount of price increases, I fear, is being driven by speculative activity," Marcus Miller, a professor of international economics at the University of Warwick. "Bets [on future price rises or declines] can become self-fulfilling if you are big enough to affect the market."

In March 2011, the World Bank's global food index was 36 per cent above levels from a year earlier, although prices for commodities have dropped in the past few weeks.  Some analysts believe price increases have more to do with a growing global population and rising middle classes, particularly in India and China, who are eating more meat and thus driving up prices for corn and other animal feed.

To make money betting on food, metals and energy, "Glencore" – like other trading houses and hedge funds – relies on one crucial commodity: Information.
"They have offices all over the world and unique access to information about production and distribution," said food security researcher Kuyek. "When the people who have that information are also the ones speculating, there is grave cause for concern; they can purchase forward contracts when they know prices are going up."

Trading firms can capitalise on instability in world food markets [EPA]


In August 2010, for example, Russia issued a ban on grain exports, after droughts ravaged crops. On August 3, the head of "Glencore's" Russian grain unit encouraged the government to halt exports. The government followed his advice on August 5, causing prices for cereals to rise 15 per cent in two days.
"Days before the export ban went into place, "Glencore" made huge bets," said Kuyek. "They had some kind of information there; companies with information are in the best place to capture profits from volatility." "Glencore", for its part, said it also lost money as a result of the ban, because it had to fulfill delivery obligations to clients outside Russia at the new, higher price.

In addition to manipulating food prices – potentially with insider information - the trading giant appears to have broken laws on several continents.
Prosecutors in Belgium charged "Glencore" employees with criminal conspiracy and corruption, alleging they illicitly sought confidential information on European export subsidies from a public official. The case will be heard in Brussels on May 12.  During Saddam Hussein's rule in Iraq, and the UN sanctions which accompanied its final years, "Glencore" made handsome profits marketing embargoed oil. In February 2001, "Glencore" bought 1million barrels of Iraqi crude oil destined for the US and diverted the oil to Croatia, where it was sold for a premium of $3million, according to a UN Security Council report.  When the news broke, the Sunday Times newspaper in the UK headlined their investigation "Secretive Swiss trader links City to Iraq oil scam".  "Glencore'"s founder and lifelong commodities hustler Marc Rich was dubbed the "face of scandal", by Vanity Fair magazine. After founding the company in 1974, Rich rose to prominence by pioneering "combat trading" -aggressive deal making in countries facing turmoil.  He traded oil for Ayatollahs when Iran was blacklisted by the US, did business with South Africa's apartheid government and skirted US trade embargoes on Cuba and Libya to make trades under the motto: Do whatever it takes.

 
In Lia Romi's community, people have to choose between sending their kids to school and buying food               [Credit: Oxfam]

"There will always be allegations that they [Glencore] are dealing with some unsavory folks," said Chris Hinde from Mining Journal magazine. "But I wouldn't say that makes them unusual for traders.".  Tony Hayward, the disgraced former BP CEO who presided over the worst oil spill in US history, has been approached by "Glencore" to become a non-executive director on the board of the company when it becomes public.  While Rich sold the company in 1993, his take-no-prisoners approach to the commodities business lives on in today's traders and speculators, including the South African CEO Ivan Glasenberg, who gave Rich's trading empire the name "Glencore".

Institutional investors from the US, East Asia and the Middle East have all committed to buying.  Aabar, the sovereign wealth fund from the United Arab Emirates, controlled by Abu Dhabi's oil-rich monarchs, is expected to become the largest "cornerstone investor", pledging to buy about $1billion worth of stock.  "It seems that they are buying a stake to strengthen the UAE's control over the global grain trade, for their own food security," said Kuyek. "In the absence of anything meaningful being done at the international level, - except for the same prescriptions of open markets and trade liberalisation." Food insecure countries in the Gulf, Northeast Asia, Korea and other regions are attempting to gain more direct control over food, as the market economy "can’t guarantee decent prices",
"Stability is to be prized," said Oxfam's David Green. And that is the last thing "Glencore" wants, as it's instability which is most profitable - for those who have the inside knowledge to exploit it.

If Dante were alive today and rewrote "The Inferno" I think he would include a special hell for food speculators. I can't get my head around the figures it seems like monopoly money and where is the moral compass?  There is none.

I know there are lots of facts and figures to read but we have to understand what is happening so that legislation, international and national can correct what is going so wrong in our societies. The facts and figures come from an excellent article on "Al Jazeera" and the opinions are mine and I will write more about this on future blogs

the complications of dyeing undies, fdr and huey long

Since the last blog I have been busy cleaning the blue dye stains from my hands, face, work surfaces and clothes, although I live in the Celtic Motherland of Wales I don't think painting your face with woad is really a fashion statement and dye is like grouting once you have started you have to finish and it will get into every room but I can report it is not worth doing.  Fortunately I had some dye so I didn't incur any costs but the results gave me 3 different shades of blue - one for the lace, one on the fabric and a third for the elastic so my undies looked like I had put them in the wrong wash.

While I was scrubbing my face and kitchen I started to think about things that do work - turn off all the electrical equipment that is on stand by and you will save £20.00 a month. Go through all your stuff and decide what you can live without - the dvds you never watch, old toys, any quilts and sell them on line e-bay, gumtree etc, if you have any old mobiles off they go that will give you some cash.  Do not sell your  gold, if you have any, on line or through one of those companies that advertise on tv,  go to a jewellers and shop around.

It's funny what you think about as you clean I started to think about Huey Long, a Governor of Louisiana from 1928 -1932 he was amazing he was too poor to go to college as he couldn't afford the books, I bet some of us are starting to feel the same about attending university and he worked as a door to door salesman in one of the poorest states in America in 1934 he created the "Share our Wealth"  programme with the motto "Every Man a King", proposing new wealth redistribution measures in the form of a net asset tax on corporations and individuals to curb the poverty and hopelessness endemic nationwide during the Great Depression. To stimulate the economy, Long advocated federal spending on public works, schools and colleges, and old age pensions in a state that only had 300 miles of paved roads that programme is extraordinary and he made sure every school had free textbooks. Of course as is the fate of nearly anyone who tries to make a difference he was assassinated in 1935 when he was a Senator but he changed the lives of the ordinary people and so did Franklin Delano Roosevelt always known as FDR he was 3 times President of America from 1933-1945.
Sorry if this is all a bit boring and historic but if you don't know the context and backstory you will never change the present or the future.
FDR's "New Deal" during the Depression of the 1930's kickstarted the economy by, again, public spending on infrastructure and public works. What those guys did is the absolute opposite of what our government is doing to us. Don't believe what is continually pushed as a basic given that there is no money and we have to "tighten our belts" (remember Herman Goering said if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth) every time some politician or tv guru says that repeat out loud after me "bullshite".You see there is plenty of money in our country it is just in the wrong hands; ultra rich people don't start small businesses or care about the community (they don't have a community just countries they live in for short periods of time to avoid paying taxes) and until we have laws that close the loopholes exempting "Non Doms" and people like Phillip Green and various big companies from paying the taxes they owe but have so far reneged on we will continue living in an unjust society where the Depression will seem like good times.

I drew on "Wikipaedia" for the facts about Huey and FDR because I didn't want to make a mistake about dates etc but the rest are my own words and I will expand on them in future blogs along side gardening and shopping (I hate both).

[

My first post

In November 2010 I started work on a book I entitled "The Art of Making Do for Those Who Have Never Had to Make Do". I wanted it to be a helpful guide on how to weather the coming hard times for so many  relativily affluent people who had never had to think too closely about taking a pay cut or losing their jobs and the physical,emotional and economic struggle that being. what I am going to bluntly call poor entails.  So many things written about saving money  are rubbish - when you have £5.00 to last the week buying virgin olive oil in bulk is not a priority and so many supposedly "cheap" meals when you cost them out properly adding in cooking time with its cost for gas or electricity, any extras like herbs or spices and how many people the meal will actually feed in the real world are not "cheap" at all. I wanted to write a sensible, ethical book that would provide real help and this blog was supposed to be the funny side, if you can call it that, of being skint  trying out all the ideas people tell you about how to save money i.e bake your own bread, keep chickens, dye your underwear.

However, one morning in the New year I turned on the BBC Breakfast News and there was an interview with a lady who had done everything to make the best of a hard time - the bread baking, turning off all the electric appliances on standby, even going so far as to take the bus to work rather than the train which was more expensive thereby putting another 2 hours on her travel time each day and she still couldn't make ends meet; a second person in this piece was in full time work but had to resort to hand outs from a charity which has food banks just like in America. I was stunned.

It was then that I knew what I wanted to write about was going to be more serious, radical and difficult than the brief I had started with, yes I am still going to try all the crazy ideas bread baking and underwear dying included but I want to look at what is really happening to us.

I live in 2011 at the start of the 21st century I do not want to regress 90 years to 1920, the start of the last century for my standard of living and I do not want to go back 70 years to 1940 for a role model of how to live.  We can do better than that, it doesn't have to be that way.